|
TheatreguideLondon
The TheatreguideLondon Review |
|
||
|
The Tempest
An
article in the programme for The Tempest (in repertory with As You Like
It, as part of The Bridge Project, a mix of British and American
actors) outlines some of the moral, religious, philosophical and
geopolitical interpretations Shakespeare's play has received, but one
of the virtues of Sam Mendes' production is that it does not impose any
external meaning or directorial concept on the play, but just tries to
stay out of its way as much as possible. The downside of this directorial discretion is a certain blandness, almost generating a wish for more in the way of interpretation, to give us a clearer vision of the play's meanings. A nobleman
stranded on an island with his young daughter has mastered magic and
the island's resident spirits, and is now given the opportunity to
exact vengeance on his enemies as they, too, land there. Will he, or
will he have gained wisdom as well as power, and discovered the value
of forgiveness and reintegration into the human community? Director Mendes'
stand-back attitude is symbolised in part by the almost bare stage,
with the theatre's walls visible, and little more than the magic circle
in the centre as scenery or props. I've seen Prosperos
driven by rage or egotism or a sense of justice, but Stephen Dillane
makes him enervated and exhausted, as if his years in exile have worn
him down and he must now drag out his last reserves of strength to work
out his final scheme. The problem is that, while it makes sense in
theory as a characterisation, in practice it give us little sense of
the man to latch onto, little with which to decide whether we
sympathise. The same problem of
the desire not to inject too much resulting in giving us too little
affects Christian Camargo's performance as Ariel, as Camargo invests
the sprite with a bemused boredom through much of the play, watching
the humans with some of his cousin Puck's feeling of 'What fools these
mortals be,' though without Puck's accompanying enjoyment of the
sight. And I think that a
fear of imposing too much nontextual meaning on Caliban results in Ron
Cephas Jones being left with almost no character at all to play, when
we really want some guidance in how to respond to him. Juliet Rylance and
Edward Bennett are attractive and believable as the young lovers, and
while I grant that Shakespeare gives them little more than generic
young lovers to play, it would be nice if they had added some
individualising touches. Well, you can see
the main thrust of this review - the production doesn't get in
Shakespeare's way, which is more than you can say of some, and
particularly if you know the play or previous productions and can fill
in some of the missing overtones, this is a quite adequate experience. But it doesn't add anything to the play either, and that's its limitation. Gerald Berkowitz Return to TheatreguideLondon home page. Review - The Tempest - Old Vic 2010 |
|
||